Defining Consumer-Relevant Quality Boundaries for Body Lotion

Using DOSD to translate acceptable squeezability into product and viscosity specifications

The Challenge

Hand_squeezing_thick_cosmetic_tube
Product specifications are often expressed in instrumental terms such as viscosity. But a technically meaningful change is not necessarily a consumer-relevant change.
For products dispensed from a tube or bottle, viscosity influences how easily the product can be squeezed out and used. Because viscosity can shift through formulation changes, processing and shelf life, product teams need to know not only the target value, but how far the product can move before dispensing becomes unacceptable to consumers.

The Approach

A series of lotion prototypes was created to systematically span viscosity levels above and below the current product reference.

Consumers evaluated one clearly defined question:

Is the product’s squeezability acceptable?

A two-step SDT-based acceptance judgement — acceptable/not acceptable followed by sureness — was used to quantify how much each prototype differed from the reference in acceptability. Instrumental rheological measurements were collected in parallel.
Cosmetic_tubes_showing_viscosity

From consumer response to an operating range

acceptance
The analysis identified which viscosity changes remained within an acceptable consumer range and where the risk of rejection started to increase.

By connecting those consumer boundaries to rheological measurements, an experiential judgement such as “this is becoming too difficult to squeeze” can be translated into a measurable range for formulation and quality control.

The result is not simply a preferred viscosity value, but an estimate of the operating space within which the product can vary while still delivering an acceptable consumer experience.

Decision value

Instead of specifying one ideal viscosity value, the product team can define a consumer-relevant operating window:
  • the range that supports acceptable product use; 
  • the boundaries beyond which consumer risk increases;
  • and the margin available to accommodate formulation, manufacturing and shelf-life variation.
This gives product developers and quality teams a direct link between consumer tolerance and measurable technical specifications, rather than relying only on whether prototypes are statistically different.
decision_value

Broader Principle

This is ultimately a case about translating human tolerance into technical specifications.
The same approach can be applied wherever a physical product property changes through formulation, processing or shelf life and teams need to understand the consumer-relevant boundary — for example thickness, spreadability, firmness, dispensing force or other usage-related characteristics.

Scientific foundation

Kim, M.-A., van Hout, D., Dessirier, J. M., & Lee, H.-S. (2018). Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: A signal detection measurement with higher reliability than hedonic scaling. Food Quality and Preference, 63, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.07.012https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104740 
Kim, M.-A., van Hout, D., & Lee, H.-S. (2018). Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: Comparative and absolute measures of satisfaction based on signal detection theory. Food Quality and Preference, 68, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118635353.ch9  
Kim, M.-A., van Hout, D., Zandstra, E. H., & Lee, H.-S. (2019). Consumer acceptance measurement focusing on a specified sensory attribute of samples: Can the attribute-specified degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method replace hedonic scaling? Food Quality and Preference, 75, 198–208. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950329318306414
Interested in applying this type of thinking to product change, reformulation, or long-term innovation decisions?